Were warned about the storm - will people stop believing alerts? 0

Our Latvia
TV3
Женщина на берегу моря
Photo: Unsplash

On Thursday, thousands of residents of Latvia received an alarming warning about a possible dangerous storm. Many canceled plans and prepared for bad weather, but in most areas, serious consequences did not occur. Now residents are debating: is it better to have unnecessary alarm or risk being left without warning before a real threat?

On Thursday morning, a warning about a severe thunderstorm was sent out to approximately two-thirds of Latvia's territory, including Riga. However, the predicted storm clouds shifted significantly further east, and the storm mainly affected Selia. Moreover, it was initially expected that the thunderstorm would be much more dangerous — with large hail and even the possibility of tornadoes. As a result, the anticipated storm did not arrive in most parts of the country.

Among the surveyed residents, opinions were divided. Some believe it is better to receive a warning in advance, even if the danger passes. Others fear that after such incidents, people will stop taking alerts seriously, TV3 Ziņas reports.

"It’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, it’s good that they warn us. On the other hand, it seems a bit pointless if nothing happens. I was ready for a strong storm to start, and in the end, nothing happened. I even had to change my plans for the day," said Riga resident Paula.

Capital resident David admitted that he and his friends were waiting for the promised thunderstorm, but it never came.

"This really can make you start not believing the warnings. We waited, prepared, and in the end, nothing happened," he noted.

In response, officials emphasize that the decision to send out the warning was fully justified, as the risk of dangerous weather phenomena remained high.

Andris Viksna, head of the forecasting and climate department at the Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre, explained that the actual situation met the criteria for an orange warning. "If the thunderstorm front had shifted just 50-100 kilometers further west, it would have affected the central part of the country. Riga was just lucky. In summer, it is impossible to predict with absolute accuracy where local thunderstorm clouds will move. But it is enough to recall similar cases from previous years to understand: the consequences could have been very serious," the specialist noted.

Based on meteorologists' forecasts, the decision to send out an emergency message is made by the State Fire and Rescue Service. Deputy Chief Ivars Nakurs emphasized that the main thing is to inform people in a timely manner.

"It is important to be warned. It would be much worse if a dangerous phenomenon actually occurred and people found themselves at the epicenter of events without any notification. Then the question would arise: why weren’t we warned?" he stated.

Experts remind that strong thunderstorms and storms in Latvia are becoming increasingly common in summer, so residents are likely to continue receiving such warnings in the future.

Redaction BB.LV
0
0
0
0
0
0

Leave a comment

READ ALSO