It is no coincidence that when debating Istanbul and not only it, one of the most frequently mentioned arguments is the Kremlin. If Putin's Russia were not next to us, the political landscape of Latvia would likely look different. But geography is what it is, and therefore the political reality is such that without 'Unity' it is difficult to create a new coalition that does not pose a political threat to its participants. This implies entering into a coalition with 'Latvia First', whose pro-Kremlin reputation could cast a bad shadow on the others.
'Unity' has warned potential government overthrowers that they will not join them in the next coalition,” emphasizes the observer.
“Everyone is calculating - what is more advantageous: to be in the position or in the opposition? There is no clear answer from almost any party, as there is electoral benefit in both cases. An interesting situation has developed. 'Unity' has clearly stated that it will not overthrow its own government. The New Conservative Party (NCP), perhaps not so directly, has also indicated that they will not be direct overthrowers of the government. This means that they will vote together with the coalition on the budget, which, if not adopted, would automatically mean the fall of the government.”
Only the 'Progressives' remain, whose faction leader and party leader Andris Šuvaevs is making increasingly militant statements, making it clear that things cannot continue this way. One can understand him. Political concession for the sake of practical benefit does not serve his electorate well.
